Tessen vs the popular bot platforms

We graded the strategies the popular bots ship with.

Cryptohopper and 3Commas are excellent automation platforms. But automation isn't edge — so we took the community-standard strategy templates their own guides teach, and ran each one through the Tessen grading engine: 6 years of BTC/ETH/SOL data, out-of-sample split, real fees. Every result below links to a public verify page.

F

76.5% win rate. −88.9% total return.

That's the most popular bot recipe on the internet — buy the RSI dip, take profit at +1.5%, let the averaging-down handle losers — across 2,247 out-of-sample trades. It wins three times out of four and still loses almost everything, because the average loss is 3.4× the average win. A win rate is not an edge. This is exactly the trap the Grade exists to catch.

See the full verified grade →

Five templates, five honest grades.

These are the standard configurations documented in the platforms' own guides and community tutorials — not anyone's proprietary strategy. We graded the trading logic itself. Click any verify link to see the full report, including the gate checks and per-asset breakdown.

F
The classic DCA preset
DCA-bot dip signal (RSI-7), no stop

Buy when RSI(7) dips under 30 on 15m, take profit +1.5%, no stop loss — the martingale “handles” losers. Graded with only a wide catastrophic stop.

Win rate
76.5%
Net/trade
−4.0 bp
R:R
1 : 0.30
Return
−88.9%
OOS trades
2,247
Verify →
F
DCA preset + stop loss
Same dip signal, with the recommended 2% stop

The stop loss the guides recommend when you don’t martingale: TP +1.5%, SL −2%.

Win rate
56.4%
Net/trade
−6.5 bp
R:R
1 : 0.72
Return
−281.9%
OOS trades
4,323
Verify →
F
The classic strategy-designer template
RSI + Bollinger mean-reversion

Buy when RSI(14) < 30 and price is under the lower Bollinger band on 1h; TP +2%, SL −3%.

Win rate
54.9%
Net/trade
−29.5 bp
R:R
1 : 0.64
Return
−180.5%
OOS trades
612
Verify →
F
Template-library staple
MACD momentum

Long while the MACD histogram is positive, short while negative, on 1h; 24-bar time exit.

Win rate
45.5%
Net/trade
−5.6 bp
R:R
1 : 1.14
Return
−169.6%
OOS trades
3,014
Verify →
F
Template-library staple
Stochastic 20/80

Buy stochastic < 20, short > 80, on 1h; TP +2%, SL −2%.

Win rate
48.2%
Net/trade
−11.1 bp
R:R
1 : 0.96
Return
−459.5%
OOS trades
4,138
Verify →

What we deliberately didn't grade: martingale safety-orders and grid mechanics. They aren't a directional edge — they reshape whenyou feel losses (many small wins, then one deep drawdown that holds the bag). Grading the underlying signal is the honest test: if the signal has no edge, averaging into it more deeply doesn't create one.

A different starting point.

This isn't a feature-count table — on feature count, the incumbents win today and we say so. The difference is what each platform puts between you and a losing strategy.

TessenTypical bot platforms
What happens before your strategy tradesA mandatory honest grade: 6 years of data, out-of-sample split, fees modeled, public verify link.You can backtest if you choose to. Nothing stops an ungraded strategy from going live.
How results are reportedNet expectancy after fees, R:R, and drawdown — win rate is shown but never sold.Win rate and total profit are the headline numbers in marketplaces and social sharing.
Overfitting protectionTrain/out-of-sample split is built into every grade; only OOS results count toward the gate.Backtests typically run on the full window you pick — optimizing on the same data you evaluate on.
Marketplace modelNEXA lists only gate-passing agents. Copying is free; owners earn a fee on your real profit only.Paid signal/strategy subscriptions — you pay monthly whether or not the signals make money.
PricingBuilding, grading, and paper trading are free. One prepaid pass unlocks live — no card on file, no auto-renew.Monthly subscription tiers; features like backtesting and more bots unlock at higher tiers.
AI “optimization”Retune proposals must pass all 5 gates AND beat the baseline out-of-sample — and each generation is counted, because re-mining the same history erodes validity. Honest negatives are reported.“Autonomous optimization cycles” iterate until the backtest looks better — optimizing and evaluating on the same history, with a deploy button at the end and no hard out-of-sample gate.
Maturity & breadthClosed beta. 6 exchanges live. Young and honest about it.Mature platforms, years in production, more exchanges and bot types. Genuinely more featureful today.

Cryptohopper and 3Commas are trademarks of their respective owners; neither is affiliated with Tessen. Descriptions reflect each platform's publicly documented model as of July 2026 — if something is out of date, tell usand we'll fix it. Grades apply to the strategy configurations shown, run on our data and engine — not to the platforms themselves, which execute whatever strategy you give them.

Evaluating the newer AI strategy platforms? Tessen vs QuantPilot — validation vs optimization →

Deciding between the two incumbents? Cryptohopper vs 3Commas — the honest head-to-head →

Your bot is running one of these, or something like it.

Describe it in plain English and get the honest grade in about a minute — free, no account needed. If it fails, you just saved real money. If it passes, you've got something worth trading.